Carelessly formulated conditions precedent: undesirable effect on the transaction?

Carelessly formulated conditions precedent: undesirable effect on the transaction?

The intention of a party that stipulates a condition precedent (“opschortende voorwaarde”) is clear: he wants to make the exigibility of his commitment subject to certain facts or acts, of which it is still uncertain at the time of signature whether they will occur. Making a commitment subject to the fulfillment of one or more conditions precedent, is in principle valid. In a transaction practice, this technique allows to already proceed with the signing of the agreement – and bind the parties – although certain essential steps have not yet been taken. Just think of a buyer of shares who…


Read more
Read Article →
Exit guarantee for shareholders via put option, buyback of own shares or withdrawal?

Exit guarantee for shareholders via put option, buyback of own shares or withdrawal?

Many shareholder agreements contain provisions setting out exit mechanisms allowing shareholders to exit the shareholding in the future, for instance when a shareholder is no longer operationally involved (hereinafter the “departing shareholder”), e.g. a put option (“verkoopoptie”), a withdrawal right (“uittredingsrecht”) or a mechanism of buyback of own shares by the company (“inkoop van eigen aandelen”). In case of a put option, the departing shareholder can oblige the other shareholders to purchase his shares and pay the purchase price. In the event of a withdrawal or buyback of own shares, the buyout will be funded by the company itself. Whether…


Read more
Read Article →
Update: reply to parliamentary question about the opt-in: the EGM having decided to opt-in, can immediately take other decisions applying the CAC

Update: reply to parliamentary question about the opt-in: the EGM having decided to opt-in, can immediately take other decisions applying the CAC

In a former blog article, we pointed out the practical implications of the fact that the legislator, quite unfortunately, has linked the entry into force of the opt-in to the publication of such decision in the annexes of the Belgian Official Gazette and not to the actual time of the decision itself. In our opinion, it was not possible, after the ‘opt-in’ decision, to take other decisions by already applying the new CAC, and include them all in the same deed. We considered that the decisions other than the one related to the opt-in could only be taken applying the…


Read more
Read Article →
Conflicts of interest under the new CAC - new rules, new questions and points of attention

Conflicts of interest under the new CAC – new rules, new questions and points of attention

The regulation set out in the Companies Code (CC) to manage conflicts of interest in cases of directors having conflicting proprietary interests is complicated, since it depends on the situation. Just think about the appointment of an ad hoc trustee in private limited companies (‘BVBA’ / ‘SPRL’) having no collegial board; the duty to abstain imposed on directors of listed public limited companies (‘genoteerde NV’ / ‘SA noteé’) which does not apply on directors of unlisted companies; the lack of statutory regulation for directors of non-profit organizations (‘VZW’ / ‘ASBL’) – the list goes on. The legislator has taken the…


Read more
Read Article →
Opt-in only becomes applicable after publication of the amendment to the articles of association - practical implications

Opt-in only becomes applicable after publication of the amendment to the articles of association – practical implications

The new Companies and Associations Code (CAC) entered into force on 1 May 2019. This implies that newly incorporated companies whose deed of incorporation has been deposited at the registry on or after 1 May 2019, will be governed by the new CAC. For existing companies, a transition period is provided for until 1 January 2020. Until that date, they will still be governed by the former Companies Code. From 1 January 2020, the mandatory provisions of the CAC (including the additional provisions unless derogated from in the articles of association) will become applicable. The legislator enables existing companies however…


Read more
Read Article →
Conversion of an abolished legal form: when and with or without application of the conversion procedure?

Conversion of an abolished legal form: when and with or without application of the conversion procedure?

The Company and Associations Code (CAC) reduces the number of legal forms and abolishes many of the currently existing legal forms. Within the category of companies without legal personality, the ‘tijdelijke handelsvennootschap’ (’société momentanée’) and the ‘stille handelsvennootschap’ (’société interne’) both disappear. Indeed, the same objective can be achieved through the form of the ‘maatschap’ (’société simple’), whether by setting up a ‘tijdelijke maatschap’ (’société simple momentanée’) for a limited period of time or a specific project, or a ‘stille maatschap’ (’société simple interne’) led by a manager who is acting in his own name. Within the category of companies…


Read more
Read Article →
Claim notification periods under representations and warranties: don't just agree on them – also remember them and communicate them!

Claim notification periods under representations and warranties: don’t just agree on them – also remember them and communicate them!

An acquisition agreement often obligates the buyer of the shares to notify the sellers of any claims against the sellers arising from an infringement of the provided representations and warranties within a certain term (e.g. 2 months) after becoming aware of the fact causing the infringement. The reason behind this is that timely notification enables the sellers to take action to restrict the damage. A second purpose of imposing a term is to establish legal certainty between parties. Terms of 30 days, 2 months, etc., which at the time of the negotiations may have seemed long enough for the buyer,…


Read more
Read Article →
A variable price in the acquisition contract – watch out for requalification and manipulation

A variable price in the acquisition contract – watch out for requalification and manipulation

Acquisition agreements may provide for either a fixed or a variable price. A variable price is valid only if it can be determined. Hence the parameters that serve as the basis for establishing the variable price must constitute objective criteria that do not require a new indication of intent from the parties. Acquisition agreements often contain an earn-out clause: (part of) the price is determined based on the profit earned by the company in the years following the acquisition. Usage of the earn-out clause is most common when the selling party retains an important role in the management of the…


Read more
Read Article →
Even a 'non-binding' letter of intent may lead to liability – the theory (at last, but strictly) applied by the Antwerp Court of Appeal

Even a ‘non-binding’ letter of intent may lead to liability – the theory (at last, but strictly) applied by the Antwerp Court of Appeal

Acquisition agreements are often preceded by some preliminary agreement (also called a declaration of intent; letter of intent; memorandum of understanding; agreement in principle, etc.) that not seldom is considered as non-binding by the parties. Such initial document aims at describing the status of the negotiations, the agreed principles, and any further steps required to arrive at a final acquisition agreement. Parties who do not yet wish to enter into a binding agreement must make an explicit statement to that effect in the preliminary agreement. If they fail to do so and then reach an agreement on the subject of the…


Read more
Read Article →